In a recent Facebook discussion about PARCC and the Common Core State Standards, I commented that the Common Core standards are developmentally inappropriate in the younger grades. Another participant in the discussion challenged that assertion, and pointed to the CCSS kindergarten literacy standards. He asked me to identify what was inappropriate in them.
Here’s an edited and expanded version of my response:
I think pointing to the Reading:Literacy Standards (Kindergarten) for an analysis of developmental inappropriateness misses the mark. My concern with the standards for the youngest grades is not with the Reading: Literacy Standards, which are about comprehension and understanding stories, but rather with the Reading: Foundational Standards (Kindergarten), which are about phonics and decoding words. The Reading: Foundational Standards require ALL kindergartners, for instance, to be reading CVC words (i.e., 3 letter short vowel words) by the end of kindergarten, unless those words end with r, x, or l. Requiring such phonics-based reading skills at that level by the end of kindergarten is developmentally inappropriate for many five year olds. I can tell you that from my own experience.
I have two girls. Both have September birthdays. For a whole host of reasons, none of which I’m interested in debating here, we made the decision that we were fortunate enough to have the resources to make — we gave both of them an extra year of private preK. As a result, both started kindergarten just before they turned six, rather than just before they turned five.
Both of my girls are bright, capable, and inquisitive. But they’re also very different kids, with different learning styles, interests, and developmental paths. As an aside, I can’t tell you how glad I am that I have two kids, because seeing how different my younger daughter’s path is from my older daughter’s is a constant reminder of how amazingly different two typically developing small humans from the same gene pool really can be. It’s remarkable to see — and a constant source of wonder for me.
As I hope my regular readers might imagine, my house is full of books. We don’t have a family room, but in addition to our living room, we do have a dedicated library on the first floor of our house, and it was that library with its floor to ceiling built in bookshelves that made me fall in love with this house. But even the library doesn’t come close to holding our book collection. I’m not quite like my old friend Mel, of blessed memory, who, with his wife, had to move out of his four bedroom house to make room for the books it contained (he and his wife went to live in a small apartment nearby instead), but if it wasn’t for the Kindle, that path might have been part of my future.
We’ve read to our kids regularly since they were in utero. Not surprisingly, our collection of children’s books has mushroomed. My oldest has four bookcases in her room, and my youngest can’t contain her books on the 3 bookcases in her room. I belong to a book club, I read regularly for pleasure (and let my kids see me doing so), my kids know that I taught high school English Language Arts, and it’s been clear to my kids for their whole lives that understanding life through literature is central to our family values.
My oldest started asking me to teach her how to read shortly before her fourth birthday. Although my academic training was in teaching middle and high school, I was game to try. So I picked up a few resources, and we gave it a whirl. However, despite the fact that she already knew all of the letters and their sounds, it quickly became clear that she simply wasn’t ready, so we put formal reading instruction aside. I think we made another stab at it about three or four months later, but again, no dice. We tried it once or twice more, but each time the frustration for both of us outweighed any benefit, so we stopped.
Then, in about March of her last year of preK (so she was five and a half at that point), it was like a switch turned on. Within about a week of her renewed request for reading instruction, she was suddenly reading, fluently, anything and everything she could get her hands on. She never looked back. By the time she entered kindergarten six months later, she was reading — with comprehension — a wide variety of texts, including simple chapter books. She’s continued to gobble up books — and to love reading — ever since.
Obviously, meeting the kindergarten foundational standards would have been a no-brainer for my oldest. But remember, she had the gift of that “extra year,” so she started kindergarten weeks before her sixth — not her fifth — birthday. That was before our district’s Common Core implementation, but I’m not sure reading would have been so straightforward for her if she’d been forced to heavily drill phonics-based reading skills during what ended up (because of our choice) being her final year of pre-K. It’s clear to me from trying (at her request) to teach her that she simply wasn’t ready for phonics-based reading instruction at that time, but that’s when many kids — especially those who have fewer financial resources — enter kindergarten.
My youngest is a kindergartener right now. Like her sister, she also has a September birthday, so she turned six shortly after school started in September. Unlike her sister, she didn’t start kindergarten reading — and there is no way she was ready developmentally a year ago, even though she met the kindergarten cut off back then (i.e., she could be in first grade now). Now, she is on track to meet the standard that requires reading CVC words by the end of the year, but that’s only because she was fortunate enough to start kindergarten just before her sixth birthday rather than just before her fifth. Many — probably most — kids in our country don’t have that luxury.
My youngest, even more so than my oldest, is also a kid who gets really frustrated when asked to do a task she’s not yet developmentally ready to manage. Whether it’s academics or something else, when we’ve made the mistake of trying to push her to do something before she was developmentally ready, the result has been that she’s gotten really resistant to the task she’s not ready for, to the point that she ends up mastering it far later than I think she would have if we’d just left her alone.
I am convinced that forcing my youngest to learn phonics to read a year ago — when she could have already been in kindergarten — would have been a nightmare. In fact, I tried briefly, remembering her sister’s experience, but it quickly became clear that forcing reading before she was ready was a terrible idea. To be honest, even the tiny (and quickly abandoned) attempt I made caused some reading resistance, which I think we’ve pretty much managed to undo at this point, but it’s taken a lot of patience to get there.
Until now, my youngest just hadn’t hit the developmental switch required to read successfully. But that developmental switch — i.e., that point at which individual kids are ready for the abstraction necessary to be able to translate symbols on a page into the spoken language they’ve spent the last five years acquiring — it’s not something we can switch on earlier either by wishing or by imposing standards requiring it. Some kids are ready at four, some kids are ready at five, and some kids are ready at six. All of those ages are within the normal range for reading development — and despite taking some time to look, there’s nothing I’ve come across that indicates that an earlier reader’s long term outcomes will be better than those of a kid who learns to read later in the typical developmental range.
This difference among children — as illustrated by my own girls — is precisely why a standard requiring real progress toward phonics-based reading in kindergarten is developmentally inappropriate. As I learned in my educational psychology and reading instruction classes, by sometime between their sixth and seventh birthdays, most kids have reached the developmental milestone that allows them to learn to read. At the moment, although it’s a slower process than with my older daughter, I can see that my six year old is getting there. For instance, she’s finally suggesting, at least once in awhile (to avoid housework, but that’s another story), that she try reading with me. But again, she’s a full year older than many other kindergartners.
My youngest is bright and creative. In fact, I suspect that one of the reasons she’s relatively slow to read is because she can imagine alternate — and entertaining — realities for hours on end. That is, her imagination is so engaging that she doesn’t need authors’ stories to provide entertainment for her. As a result, reading — that is, the process of interacting with an author’s imagination — is less appealing for her, and so she’s less motivated to do it.
My daughters’ different experiences with learning to read are why I believe that the Common Core Reading: Foundational Standards for Kindergarten, at least, are developmentally inappropriate. Forcing phonics-based reading on kindergartners as a standard they must all meet to be on the path toward college and career readiness is counterproductive because it’s developmentally inappropriate for many five year olds. If my younger daughter had started kindergarten a year ago, as she could have, I suspect that she would have been subjected to a cascade of interventions. Those interventions would not have occurred because she had a learning disability or any other problem that needed addressing. Rather, she would have been subjected to such interventions because the Reading: Foundational Standards for Kindergarten are simply inappropriate for many five year olds.
The solution is to change the standards. Yet instead, their advocates often seem to be focused on interventions aimed at making all kids march in lockstep to a rhythm that fails to reflect the normal range of their developmental trajectories. It’s that insistence on lockstep, especially in the youngest grades, that frustrates me. Such insistence appears to mark the difference between endorsing a set of standards and advocating an ideology that allows no deviation from the party line. Our kids — especially our kindergartners — deserve better.
P.S. I think this story also explains why the developmentally inappropriate expectations of the CCSS reading foundational standards are only going to widen, rather than narrow, the achievement gap. As noted above, the only reason that my little one will be able to meet the CCSS reading foundational standards by the end of kindergarten is going to be because she was privileged enough to have parents who could “red-shirt” her. It’s the fact that we could afford to choose to keep her in a high-quality play-based preschool for an extra year that’s going to allow her to meet CCSS for kindergarten. Not all families have that luxury: instead, the younger kindergarteners are going to be more likely to end up in repetitive, phonics and decoding focused response to intevention (“RTI”) or similar programs, which I think would have frustrated my little one further, and probably sent her even further down the path toward reading resistance. How many children living in poverty are going to end up in that boat, because the standards themselves set developmentally inappropriate expectations?
20 thoughts on “You Can’t Force Developmental Milestones: A Parent’s Perspective on the CCSS Kindergarten Foundational Reading Standards”
Beautifully written. The one point that I would add is that the very use of the term “standard” is the stumbling block of the predatory reform movement. As your example demonstrates, even siblings from a somewhat privileged home develop at different rates. To require that all children in any given age cohort meet an arbitrary standard (based on a test score) goes against all the science of cognitive development.
You probably saw this report from Defending the Early Years, but just in case, here’s my short read-through of its explanation of why those K standards are a waste.
Thank you for this post that beautifully explains why we cannot “standardize” our children – especially the youngest and most vulnerable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
VERY well written and EXCELLENT points. I was fortunate enough to be able to homeschool both my sons. My youngest was NINE before reading clicked for him. He is now a dean’s list student in college, loves learning and loves to read. I shudder to think what would have happened if he’d been in public school 15 years ago let alone NOW.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your experience almost mirrors mine with my two girls, except that one was a crazy early reader and their birthdays didn’t make as much sense for red-shirting (although in retrospect the older could have gone in a year earlier had I pushed, and the younger probably should have waited a year).
Kids’ development is like seasons to me:
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé.
My son had an April 30 birthday. He was the second- youngest boy in his kindergarten class even though the cutoff was Sept 1. He was not an early reader, at the end of K he was at .3. Over the summer though we went to the library a lot and at the beginning of school, he was reading 1.3 level books! Yes, everyone is different and moves at a different pace. My second child picked up reading much more quickly. She’s also a girl. Maybe that made a difference.
By the way note that many people are now focused on “early childhood” education, with a focus on “high quality” pre schools. They may not have the luxury of setting aside something for a few months because the teachers will be instructed to “follow the framework”, “get with the program or you’re out of here”, and “leave no 4 year old behind”.
Reblogged this on aureliomontemayor and commented:
#TellEWA: #EdBlogNet #citizenjournalist
I have been a kindergarten teacher for 23 years, and, “Well-said” by all of you. I just want to add one connection that came to mind as I read the article, and all posts. When my daughters (who are now 29, and 32) were going through potty training, I asked their pediatrician when to start. His answer: “Well, you can start now, and it can takes months (if they are not ready), or you can wait until they are ready, and it can take a few days.” That is what I did. Stress-free, and happy, and successful young women today. : )
My son also has a September birthday and, thank goodness, missed our state’s cut-off date last year for Kindergarten. He turned six two weeks into Kindergarten this year and is now almost six and a half. He is just now starting to blend sounds on CVC words. We tried before, even at the beginning of the year (he had his letter sounds down), and he just couldn’t do it. He is also one that gets frustrated when pushed to do something he just can’t do (not for lack of trying).
I have seen the developmentally inappropriate aspect of many of the CCSS. I have four children and teach 6th grade. You are so right about all children being different! My 3rd grade son is struggling so much this year….he is shutting down. It is sad to see so many of my students becoming frustrated and giving up. I have recently started a blog to make parents/teachers aware of what the current education system is doing to our kids. I look forward to reading your blog posts!
very well written and excellent points. I was fortunate enough to be able to homeschool both my sons. My youngest was nine before reading clicked for him. He is now a dean’s list student in college, loves learning and loves to read. I shudder to think what would have happened if he’d been in public school 15 years ago let alone.
Can I share this blog on my blog site?
You are welcome to link back to this post, of course. I would appreciate if you do not reproduce it in full elsewhere, however. You may link to either this post or the post as it appeared on The Washington Post’s website. Thanks for asking.